[-empyre-] Returning to bidimensionality & the body

["BARBARA LONG" <blong3@bigpond.net.au>]

As I read the discussions concerning bidimensionality and the creation of
new spaces, the changing of mind frames so that communication could occur
through something other than what we now understand as gammar, or those
mechanisms that give meaning to the weave on our various looms, I started
reading 'bidimensionality' in my head as biodimensionality. This word it
seemed, sounded better in my mind - a rhythm existed that was missing in
bidimensionality. Biodimensionality allows for a definition that  can be
read across the disciplines of  philosophy, maths, physics, etc and could
entwine itself in Melinda's axes of 3D space whilst incorporating
bioenergetics, bioengineering, biofeedback - all studies it would seem that
could assist in our exploration of the 'viractual', of the discovery of mind
frames which are already translating/creating digital languages into
meaningful communications. I'm a novice here this may have been said before
or be taking the meaning elsewhere.

Also, just because representations of the body and our re-defining of the
body in a digital context is my personal interest, I would like to ask
Joseph and (all of course) to comment on Brendan's questioning of "the
'Modern Project' to remake the world as it 'should be' etc" Joseph mentioned
previously within the interview format: 'the contemporary body as
contaminated by non-biological phenomena ...at work a principal to surpass
nature.' Is this humanity imposing, proposing on and to nature or can we
develop to know ourselves as 'emerging out of the energy of nature' and can
we represent this in a way that is communicated into many spaces.

Regards B